In The News
Read current news by clicking on the links to your left.

Legal News Headlines

News

Business

[06/11] Rude traveling salespeople evicted from Minn. hotel
[07/02] Fugitive hedge-fund swindler surrenders in Mass.
[06/30] Oil is making millionaires in North Dakota
[06/23] Big Dig contractor files for bankruptcy

More...

Insurance

[07/02] UnitedHealth cuts 4,000 jobs and 2008 outlook
[06/26] Fidelity: $85k needed for long-term care costs
[06/25] Health insurance lags most in Southwest, CDC says
[06/25] Insurer wants to sell wind, flood coverage in 1 policy

More...

Litigation

[07/03] Continental ordered to trial in Concorde explosion
[07/03] Florida Supreme Court nixes Indian casino pact
[07/03] Judge in Ky. gives panel 1 day in fen-phen trial
[07/02] Astra shares up 6 pct on Seroquel court ruling

More...

Personal Injury

[06/11] Man feels fine after being shot in head by nailgun
[06/06] Pa. crews rescue nude man stuck in portable potty
[06/24] Brain injuries cause half of seniors' fall deaths
[06/20] Study: Treating herpes doesn't prevent HIV

More...

Product Liability

[06/25] US panel endorses 2nd vaccine for kids' virus
[06/17] FDA: Part of Mexico cleared in salmonella probe
[06/16] FDA: older psych drugs have fatal risks in seniors
[06/12] Study: Marijuana potency increases in 2007

More...

Case Summaries

Commercial Law

[07/02] Deckers Corp. v. US
In a suit contesting the proper classification of three styles of sports sandals under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, a decision holding that the merchandise was properly classified under subheading 6404.19.35 is affirmed where the sandals at issue have open toes and open heels, and lack the features of the named exemplars of 6406.11.80, and thus the imported goods are not classifiable under that subheading notwithstanding their claimed status as athletic footwear.

[07/02] Cavin v. Home Loan Ctr., Inc.
In a suit involving a mailer sent by defendant announcing its mortgage program and claiming that defendant violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by failing to present plaintiffs' with a firm offer of credit, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) the letter at issue presented a firm offer of credit, despite the absence of some material terms and the minimal number of consumers who obtained the loan; and 2) thus, defendant did not violate the FCRA.

[06/30] Waltrip v. Kimberlin
In a priority dispute between competing liens, by a judgment creditor and debtor's attorney, over settlement proceeds, judgment finding the judgment lien had priority over the attorney lien is reversed and remanded where: 1) the creditor had a lien which did not cover commercial tort claims while the settlement proceeds at issue stemmed from commercial tort claims; 2) the attorney lien was created by the retainer agreement between plaintiffs and counsel, and it was created before creditor filed a notice of lien in the pending action; and 3) the notice of lien did not relate back to prior liens, as those liens covered different property.

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.