[09/10] Stocks edge higher, continue September rally
[09/10] Euro slightly lower at $1.2684
[09/10] Arcadian Health's Chief Financial Officer Invited to Speak at the Stifel Nicolaus 2010 Healthcare Conference
[09/10] CNinsure Ranks 39th in Forbes Asia's 'Best Under A Billion' List
[08/26] Mass. reaches $1.35M settlement with biotech co.
[08/19] Billionaire Donald Bren breaks privacy in lawsuit
[09/10] NC university considers rails on bunks after death
[09/10] 4 dead, 53 homes destroyed in California fire
[09/10] Experts say big egg farms can mean big problems
[09/08] AP Exclusive: Back in business after peanut deaths
|
At Brock Person Guerra Reyna, we have tried hundreds of cases over the years, too many to include in this website. We have, however, chosen to include each of those cases governed by a jury verdict where the amount sought was in excess of $500,000. It is important to note that we have included every case tried under this broad category, not just select verdicts.
Capitol Meat Company v. Alamo Meat Purveyors (Bexar County) A former owner of Plaintiff sold his assets in the company and signed a non-compete agreement pledging not to work in the wholesale meat purveying business. Thereafter, and although not owning, controlling, or sharing in the profits of Defendant, the former owner of Plaintiff acted as a guarantor for Defendant who directly competed with Plaintiff. Thereafter, Plaintiff went out of business and sued Defendant. The Plaintiff alleged business losses of $2,800,000. The Plaintiff asked the jury to award $2,800,000. The pre-trial demand was $2,800,000. The pre-trial offer was $10,000. The jury returned a zero verdict in favor of the Defendant. |