[09/10] Stocks edge higher, continue September rally
[09/10] Euro slightly lower at $1.2684
[09/10] Arcadian Health's Chief Financial Officer Invited to Speak at the Stifel Nicolaus 2010 Healthcare Conference
[09/10] CNinsure Ranks 39th in Forbes Asia's 'Best Under A Billion' List
[08/26] Mass. reaches $1.35M settlement with biotech co.
[08/19] Billionaire Donald Bren breaks privacy in lawsuit
[09/10] NC university considers rails on bunks after death
[09/10] 4 dead, 53 homes destroyed in California fire
[09/10] Experts say big egg farms can mean big problems
[09/08] AP Exclusive: Back in business after peanut deaths
|
At Brock Person Guerra Reyna, we have tried hundreds of cases over the years, too many to include in this website. We have, however, chosen to include each of those cases governed by a jury verdict where the amount sought was in excess of $500,000. It is important to note that we have included every case tried under this broad category, not just select verdicts.
Jordan v. VIA Metropolitan Transit (Bexar County) Plaintiff, 78 years old, blind, and wheelchair bound, rolled out of a VIA Trans van and onto her head. She died shortly thereafter. Plaintiff sued for negligence because her wheelchair was not secured with straps available on the van and because she was left unattended for several minutes. The Plaintiff asked the jury to award $1,000,000. The pre-trial demand was $100,000. The pre-trial offer was $0. The jury returned a zero verdict in favor of the Defendant. Pruneda v. VIA Metropolitan Transit (Bexar County) Plaintiff, a pedestrian, was crossing a downtown street within a crosswalk when she was run over by a 40,000 pound VIA bus. The bus was turning left at an intersection. Three eyewitnesses confirmed that the crosswalk signal favored the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff underwent lumbar surgery and was unable to return to work after the accident. The medical specials were $55,000 and the lost wages were $588,000. The Plaintiff asked the jury to award $1,000,000. The pre-trial offer was $0. The jury returned a zero verdict in favor of the Defendant (assessing 100% negligence on the Plaintiff). |